Why shorthand still matters in journalism

Read Time:1 Minute, 19 Second

Despite advances in recording and transcription technology, shorthand remains a valuable skill in journalism. While some may view it as outdated, shorthand continues to offer advantages that modern tools cannot fully replace.

Table of Contents

One of the key reasons shorthand still matters is accuracy

Recordings can fail, batteries can die, and background noise can make the audio unclear, especially in busy public spaces. Shorthand allows journalists to capture quotes verbatim in real time, reducing the risk of misquoting their sources and strengthening the credibility of published work.

Shorthand is also closely linked to legal protection

In the UK, journalists are often required to defend their reporting against complaints or legal challenges. Clear shorthand notes provide reliable evidence of what was said and when, which can be vital in cases involving libel, defamation or regulatory scrutiny. Many UK newsrooms and media law trainers still regard shorthand as best practice for this reason. Shorthand is essential when covering court.

You can get more information on the NCTJ courses available at https://newsassociates.co.uk/what-is-the-nctj/.

Another important benefit is speed and discretion

Unlike recording devices or smartphones, shorthand allows journalists to take notes quickly. This can be useful when interviewing vulnerable sources or covering sensitive stories where recording may make interviewees uncomfortable.

Shorthand supports professional development

Many UK journalism courses accredited by the National Council for the Training of Journalists continue to require shorthand qualifications. Employers often see it as a sign of discipline, reliability and strong reporting fundamentals. In an era dominated by new technology, shorthand remains a trusted and resilient tool for many journalists.